The Hicks/Moulder "Thunderbugle" |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| How would you like to have an antenna that doesn't require an antenna tuner – and covers bands from 80 to 2 meters, including the WARC bands? If that's not enough, this antenna is broad-banded enough to cover them to their band limits – with a VSWR typically from about 1.1 to 1.8. Based on concepts such as the cage dipole (circa 1906) and the original Windom described by Loren G. Windom (in QST, Sep 1929, pp 19-22, 84), this hybrid design will take you "Back to the Future" – complete with detailed instructions on how to build it yourself. | ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The author's name is Dick Moulder and his call sign is W4OXY. He got into a discussion with a very good friend, Leamon Hicks, whose call sign is KD4KKR. Dick has been building all types of antennas since1955 and Leamon wanted an antenna that would cover the 80 and 40 meter bands. Dick thought that one over and suggested they build a Windom antenna, which is an off-center-fed dipole that would cover all bands seeing that they were harmonically related. Leamon said it sounded good, so construction started. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dick and Leamon originally built the antenna using a single wire configuration, but it was pretty narrow-banded. Years ago Dick had built a 160 meter sloper that used 8 conductors in a cage configuration with a very low SWR from 1.8 to 2.0 MHz. He was pretty sure that it would work just as well with the Windom. Cage dipoles and verticals have been used since Marconi’s time. In fact, Marconi used one for the world’s first Trans-Atlantic communications. It’s a proven fact that if you increase the diameter of a conductor, it becomes more Low Q. By doing this, it becomes more Broadbanded versus frequency. Effectively, by making an antenna in a cage configuration you have electrically increased its diameter. When Dick thought about this, that’s when he suggested to Leamon that they make the Windom into a cage design. He agreed and they built one using 8 wires with 8-in. diameter rings. It worked great, but the bandwidth didn’t quite satisfy them, so they built another using 12 wires with 20-in. diameter rings. Bingo! They had just built what they were looking for. The finished antenna is about 133’ 6” long. It’s suspended about 45’ from the ground, but any height from 30’ to 50’ should be acceptable. If you have a space problem, you can let the ends droop to form an Inverted VEE as long as you don’t exceed a 45 degree droop from horizontal. You can also bend it in the middle. All locations will yield slightly different results, and any changes you make will change its characteristics. In other words, you’ll probably have to peak and tweak to get it to perform to your satisfaction. On-the-air tests proved they had an antenna that was a winner! Leamon has made contacts on 80 and 40 meters running 100 watts barefoot with S9 plus 10 or better signal reports nationwide, and Dick has done the same. The antenna acts like it is omni-directional. For instance, they have made contacts with hams in California, New York, and Texas at the same time for roundtables. Beams tends to reject signals coming from their sides or back, so if you use a beam and try to simultaneously QSO with hams in California and New York, you’ve got a problem! Leamon and Dick are also publishing their results in the hope that this antenna will help all hams, especially the “Little Guys” who don’t have a lot of money to buy expensive towers, beams, tuners, and etc. Incidentally, this material is copyrighted in order to prevent a large company from turning this idea into a commercial antenna for big bucks. If anyone has any questions or suggestions, the author's e-mail address is bbodini@comcast.net. OK - let's get to the good stuff: the performance data. SWR and Resistance readings for all covered bands
Building the Hicks/Moulder Thunderbugle For those who are not familiar with a Windom antenna, here is a short description: a Windom is an off-center-fed dipole fed with a 4:1 Balun and coaxial cable to the shack. RG-213 or RG-8 are fine. Bear this in mind as you begin this project. List of materials:
YOUR HICKS/MOULDER THUNDERBUGLE ANTENNA LIVES!! The authors realize that building this antenna is no small undertaking, but most hams tend to be pretty dedicated to building and experimenting - else they wouldn’t be hams, would they? Dick Moulder (W4OXY) is 71 years old - and still doing building and experimenting. Now that you've built it, tt’s time to do some tests on your new creation. We recommend using a portable SWR analyzer for your SWR measurements (the MFJ-259 works great). If you don’t have one, we bet you know some ham that does! Your new Thunderbugle, like any antenna, is dependent on its surroundings, like its height above ground, proximity to trees, buildings, etc. Each location is different, so your results will probably vary somewhat from our measurement table. You’ll probably want to peak and tweak the antenna to get the results you want. Dick and Leamon found that their original design had to be lengthened a little to get it to perform best in the areas they wanted. Distance from ground didn’t seem to be a factor in their case, but it’s possible in yours. Once you get it working right, it should give you many, many hours of happy QSOs. If for some reason, you have a higher SWR than you like on a band end, using a tuner is OK if you don’t want to make any more adjustments. Well that’s about it. We hope to hear you on the air with a THUNDERBUGLE - you can often find us on 28.400 after 7 PM Central Time, give us a shout and let us know how it works for you! 73 and Happy Hamming from Leamon (KD4KKR) and Dick (W4OXY)!
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||